Turn About
In a thread below, Elizabeth Kaeton offered a link and challenged me to post it. I am happy to do so. At the 'Inky-Dinky' Diocese, she offers her reflections on the consent process of Bishop-Elect Forrester.
I disagree with a very few of Elizabeth's arguments, but I am truly glad that we on the "left" are not afraid of this kind of discussion.
Good on you, Elizabeth!
I disagree with a very few of Elizabeth's arguments, but I am truly glad that we on the "left" are not afraid of this kind of discussion.
Good on you, Elizabeth!
8 Comments:
Oh, don't encourage her, Lisa. She's in one of her unbearable moods. For a lipstick lesbian she can be so butch sometimes :)
Ah ha! I knew I was causing you to rethink your position. Well done.
Lisa - I never challenged you to post a link to my blog. I only challenged you to read my blog.
See what I mean, Lisa.
It's like having a kid sister all over again.
Well, what is it Maddy: 'Lesbianism as the New Patriarchy' or 'having a kid sister all over again'?
LOL, you two!
Yes, Elizabeth, I may have been guilty here of a bit of overstatement. You only challenged me to read your piece. In the desire for broad discussion, I went further and linked it here because I respect your perspective on this.
At the risk of stirring up the fires, something middle children typically avoid, I feel I should mention that our Bishop, Greg Rickel of the Diocese of Olympia has posted a statement regarding his position. I hasten to add that he and the diocese would fit in the "progressive" camp.
bishoprickel.com/bishop_rickels_blog/2009/04/the-election-in-northern-michigan.html
Thanks for that link, KJ.
People I respect are coming down on opposite sides of this question. As I've tried to say, I have questions.
At this point, I'm offering it up to the Spirit to guide the bishops and Standing Committees.
Post a Comment
<< Home